User login

Shop Talk: Structured Learning

(October/November 2018) posted on Mon Dec 17, 2018

Formal organized training moves the best and the brightest up the ladder.

click an image below to view slideshow

By Andy MacDougall

“We were big on density and dot gain, color control, management, and sustainability,” he explains. “Had a big sheet on press setups. I think it had nine things listed: Do this first, etc. and if none of them work to get you in color, then it’s probably not a press issue. It was called Fail Fast, or rather, Fix Fast – and move on. I reinforced this during press setups, approvals, etc. If we had a problem job, they all saw it – what the problem was, why it happened, and how to fix it and not repeat it. My plants always had the fewest problems with matching and holding color. It was different, but it worked.”

If in-plant training works well, then why don’t we see more of it? Says Bron, “I keep telling people there is a hell of a lot of difference between 10 years’ experience, and one year of experience 10 times. But that seems to be the norm in this industry. Upper management and ownership is where a lot of the problems and resistance to training occurs. I used my down time to train. I would watch my schedules and when we had gaps, fill them in with training. The big shots want to send everyone home or sweep floors so the place looks pretty.”

“In ‘nam [Vietnam], we learned combat tactics and combat shooting before we got into it so once we did get shot at, what we were trained to do became second nature. In business, sometimes, they don’t see the benefit of this.” 

Bron explains the nuts and bolts of the training program. They had what they called “ladders.” In printing operations, the ladders had three rungs, or tiers, defined by lists of what the employees should know and be proficient at. Pay was based on that level of knowledge and the tasks they performed.

The first rung was Beginning Operator, and the list contained things like setups, paperwork, squeegee care and sharpening, etc. Tier two was more complex and included, along with operating the machines, the use of the densitometers and reading for dot density and gain. The paperwork was more complex. This level also included some ink mixing and provided a raise.

Employees working at the top of the ladder used UV radiometers and spectrophotometers, made color adjustments, etc. Once again, attaining the third tier included a pay increase. Bron recalls operators who had been there for years and never made it past level one. And they had new hires who, after a couple of years, were at level three. He told them right from the start that if they ever did a layoff, they were keeping the third tier people; seniority had nothing to do with it. “The best printers were all drive and desire – as usual.”

Bron recently “un-retired.” After moving to northern Indiana, he applied for a part-time job at a T-shirt shop. This quickly morphed into a full-time job, with him running the shop. 

“They’re typical, taught from within with ‘best practice’ being what someone else told them.” (See industry training method #2.) “I’ve been showing them, from the technical side, from the training side, how what they do falls short of the mark. Last week, my third week here, we did a fairly nice 1954 Studebaker print with a five-color simulated process and you would have thought they struck gold. 

“The two things that are toughest on people are public speaking and change. Comes down to what you want to get, and where you want to go. [The] place I’m at wants to run with the big dogs: They need to learn, and change.” 


Read more from Andy MacDougall.


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.